BeWave

Blog

Categories

Picture of Samuel Tremblay

Samuel Tremblay

Hey! I’m Samuel Tremblay, VP of Technologies & Innovations at BeWave. As a passionate tech enthusiast, I’m dedicated to helping our clients leverage cutting-edge technologies to thrive and lead in their fields. Here, I’ll be sharing my insights and knowledge to help you stay ahead in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Quasar vs. Vuetify : My Personal Verdict for 2024

As we wrap up our exploration of UI frameworks, it’s clear that both Quasar and Vuetify have their merits, but there’s a notable distinction in their development pace, especially concerning the transition to Vue 3.

So, let’s dive into how these two frameworks stack up against each other, and I’ll share my personal verdict on which one deserves your attention!

Quasar vs. Vuetify : My Personal Verdict for 2024

Development Pace and Vue 3 Transition

Quasar's Agility in Adapting to Vue 3

Quasar has consistently demonstrated agility in keeping up with Vue’s ecosystem evolution. From the posts and sentiments on X, it’s evident that Quasar’s team has been proactive, ensuring their framework not only supports Vue 3 but leverages its features from the get-go.

This proactive approach means developers like us at Bewave can benefit from the latest Vue advancements without waiting for catch-up updates.

Quasar’s commitment to rapid development and updates helps maintain its reputation as a forward-thinking framework in the Vue community​.

Vuetify's Integration Challenges

On the other hand, Vuetify, while a powerful tool in its own right, experienced a noticeable lag in fully integrating with Vue 3. This delay might not affect every project, but for teams looking to adopt the newest features of Vue 3 immediately, it can pose a slight inconvenience or delay in project timelines.

This slower adaptation may lead some developers to feel less inclined to adopt Vuetify for new projects, especially when looking for the latest enhancements that Vue 3 has to offer​.

Implications for Development Teams

For development teams, these differences in pace have significant implications. The choice of framework can influence project timelines, resource allocation, and overall team efficiency. Quasar’s proactive updates provide peace of mind that developers can implement the latest features and improvements without delays, fostering a more agile development process. In contrast, teams using Vuetify may need to plan around potential delays in accessing the latest functionalities, which will impact their ability to meet deadlines or innovate quickly.

Quasar vs Vuetify : Key Features Comparison

Feature

Quasar

Vuetify

Component Library

Over 70 customizable Material Design components

Over 100 prebuilt Material Design components

Customization

Extensive customization options for unique branding

Strong adherence to Material Design, high customization available

Performance

Optimized for speed with lazy loading and tree-shaking

Solid performance, but experienced delays in integrating with Vue 3

Cross-Platform Support

Build for web, mobile, desktop from a single codebase

Primarily focused on web apps, with good mobile support

Ecosystem Support

Includes state management, routing, and SSR tools

Strong community support, extensive documentation

Community

Vibrant community with active contributions

Established community with a wealth of resources

My Personal Vote for 2024 : Quasar Framework

After considering the development pace, feature set, and the broader ecosystem support, my vote goes to Quasar. Its ability to stay ahead of the curve combined with a robust set of components and cross-platform capabilities makes it an ideal choice for our dynamic development needs at Bewave.

Quasar’s commitment to keeping up with Vue’s advancements ensures we’re always on the cutting edge of technology.

Both frameworks have significantly improved our UI development process, but Quasar’s proactive development strategy and comprehensive feature set make it my top pick for 2024.